The PGs began the session with a quick explanation of what a Manifesto is, as well as explaining how the UKYP Manifesto can help the organisation, including who gets sent a copy – the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, MPs – and how it can be used to help in campaigns.
The current UK Youth Parliament manifesto hasn’t been updated since 2009, having had a change of government since then it is necessary we maintain the significance of the manifesto, by keeping it up to date and relevant to current policies, priorities and affairs. The importance of this was later highlighted when a list was shown of some of the issues that the previous manifesto failed to discuss, including drugs and immigration.
The group were then shown how to produce a good manifesto statement, and the key features to include when creating one. The need to create strong, convincing arguments and statements was highlighted, in order for members to feel confident in presenting them to key figures and governmental groups.
A short discussion followed, based on some of the elements of Home Affairs, such as whether we should give prisoners the right to vote. On one hand, it was argued, prisoners who are set to be released during the term of the government should be able to vote, as they will be directly affected by issues, but those with longer term sentences should be denied the right, as they will not. A response to this was that such a policy may over complicate things, if someone has been imprisoned for a crime, however serious, it is
still a crime, and by doing this they lose the right to be included in society.
“I think the session went very positively, with MYPs looking
at a number of issues within, for example, the criminal justice system and the
support for rehabilitating prisoners.” Said Josh Harsant, PG.
MYPs then broke in to smaller groups to start developing
their own statements based on a subject relevant to Home Affairs of their
choice. This was followed by a feedback session, where some Members of Youth
Parliament shared their statements with the group, before being split into new
smaller groups where they discussed the statement they had written, where one
had to be eliminated. After further rounds of elimination, the 4 statements to
be voted on were relating to rehabilitating young offenders, antisocial
behaviour and what it is, access to the justice system, and reforming anti-social
behaviour and how we can reduce this. These were then shared with the group and
then voted on, with the top two being chosen to take to the Big Vote. The
winning two were related to rehabilitating young offenders and access to the
justice system.
“It was clear that the MYPs had a passion for what they were
discussing, and it was a pleasure to work with them!” explained Josh.
Written by Ellie
Vesey-Thompson, 16, Wiltshire
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.